
ROME'S CONTINUING MUSCLE FLEXING
THE INFAMOUS CITIZEN'S UNITED CASE
The Court’s Blow to Democracy
Supreme Court Threatens Democracy with Campaign Finance Decision
Former
Justice O’Connor Sees Ill in Election Finance Ruling
O'Connor Calls Citizens United Ruling 'A Problem'
Feingold: Supreme Court Decision Undermines Democracy
ROME'S PROTAGONISTS REVEAL HER
OBJECTIVE
FIVE CONSERVATIVE ROMAN CATHOLIC JUSTICES RULE
UNCONTROLLED BY STARE DECISIS (Lat. "to stand by that which is decided.")
The case
for stare decisis may be bolstered, we have said, when subsequent rulings "have
reduced the impact" of a precedent "while reaffirming the decision's core
ruling." Dickerson v. United States, 530 U. S. 428, 443 (2000).28 In the end,
the Court's rejection of Austin and McConnell comes down to nothing more than
its disagreement with their results. Virtually every one of its arguments was
made and rejected in those cases, and the majority opinion is essentially an
amalgamation of resuscitated dissents. The only relevant thing that has
changed since Austin and McConnell is the composition of this Court.Today's
ruling thus strikes at the vitals of stare decisis, "the means by which we
ensure that the law will not merely change erratically, but will develop in a
principled and intelligible fashion" that "permits society to presume that
bedrock principles are founded in the law rather than in the proclivities of
individuals." Vasquez v. Hillery, 474 U. S. 254, 265 (1986).
(From the dissenting opinion of Justice John Paul Stevens; emphasis added)
Supreme Court Decision in 'Citizens United v. FEC' Empowers New Citizen Action
|
From
"Supreme
Court Decision in 'Citizens United v. FEC' Empowers New Citizen Action": The problem is that Rome's concept of "freedom "is the liberty to impose its will:
The fact that Catholicity with you is in good condition, nay,
is even enjoying a prosperous growth, is by all means to be attributed to the
fecundity with which God has endowed His church, in virtue of which, unless men
or circumstances interfere, she spontaneously expands and propagates herself,
but she would bring forth more abundant fruits if, in addition to liberty, she
enjoyed the favor of the laws and the patronage of the public authority. (The
Great Encyclical Letters of Pope Leo XIII Freedom comes before equality: "Fidelity to the Gospel in no way restricts the freedom of others – on the contrary, it serves their freedom by offering them the truth. . . . In a social milieu that encourages the expression of a variety of opinions on every question that arises, it is important to recognise dissent for what it is, and not to mistake it for a mature contribution to a balanced and wide-ranging debate. It is the truth revealed through scripture and tradition and articulated by the church's magisterium that sets us free." (Pope Benedict XVI, Emphasis added) |
Justice Stevens' Dissenting Opinion in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
|
The Bible prophesied the coming of a "king of fierce countenance" - "fierce of face" (YLT); "of bold countenance" (NRSV). The text of the King James version reads "And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, a king of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences, shall stand up." (Dan. 8:23) The phrase "understanding dark sentences" is translated in modern idiom "understands sinister schemes" (NKJV,) "skilled in intrigue" (NRSV,) and literally "understanding hidden things" (YLT). This speaks both of a persecuting power and one who plots and executes nefarious plans in secret. The Seventh-day Adventist Biblical Research Institute in a Report on the Eleventh Chapter of Daniel, with particular reference to verses 36-39, analyzed the reference to "the King" as follows:
The power causing the people of God their trouble is not
mentioned after the 32d verse, but is implicit in the troubled experience of the
faithful. When is this persecuting power again
referred to? It is "the king" of verse 36. It must be noted that the
reading "the king" is found in the accepted Hebrew text, and
translated thus in the King James Version and nearly all standard versions of
the Scripture. After carefully weighing translations of the Hebrew on this
question, we feel that the weight of evidence is on the side of the generally
accepted rendering, "the king.”
It helps in the identification of this "king" to notice that the
power introduced as Rome is usually spoken of as "he" or "him," but in
verse 21 it is called a "kingdom," and in verse 27 the "he" and his
opponent in the battle are spoken of as "both these kings." When,
therefore, the prophet again refers to "the king" in verse 36, it is
most reasonable to apply the text to the king already mentioned. In
verse 36, without a break in the thought, and without even a new
sentence in some translations, "the king" is again presented and his
activities further explained. It would, therefore, seem to be but
reasonable to conclude that the power here set forth is the same as in
previous verses. 4. This is further emphasized by the fact that verses 36-39
so nearly parallel other texts that have always been applied to the Papacy by
most Protestant commentators. Note the following:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Therefore, from the foregoing, we conclude that verses 36-39
of Daniel 11 accurately set forth in prophetic language the work and history of
papal But
to apply the prophecy in verses 36-39 to the Papacy is to continue the
thought logically and also to retain the parallel with chapters 7 and 8.
The terms of verses 31-39 fit the Papacy better than they do any other
power of history. In the Book of Revelation this same parallel demonstrated in the chart above can be seen in Chapter 13, verses 1-10. This is the same "king of fierce countenance," and the prophecy brings this power into the present times. This is the power behind the rule of five conservative justices of the US Supreme Court. (Cf. EXEGESIS OF REVELATION -5- The Harlot and the Beast Text File) (and:
Revelation
Seminar - Part 2
Windows Media 54kbps
Therefore we conclude that it would be well to hold in
abeyance any positive interpretation of Daniel 11:4-45 until the events
foretold can be clearly seen and identified as the fulfillment of the prophecy.
Then we can with assurance and without embarrassment proclaim these events as
signs of the approaching standing up of Michael and the coming of the Lord as
presented in Daniel 12:1-3. However, it is logical beyond credible dispute that the "he" of Daniel 11:45 must be the very same personage as "the king" of verses 36-39. This may not have been so clear in 1954; but to those who have been paying attention to the Vatican's interest in Jerusalem it is obvious that current events are moving towards the fulfillment of Daniel 11:45 and "the approaching standing up of Michael and the coming of the Lord as presented in Daniel 12:1-3." (Cf. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS) For the past thirty years, and especially since the year 2000, we have seen the increasing influence of the Church of Rome on the American political scene, aided and abetted by the Protestant Religious Right. This is directly in line with the prophecy of Rev. 13:12. The Beast and apostate Protestantism as the False Prophet have together made an Image to the Beast. The alliance dominates all three branches of the US government. Each branch in turn surprises by actions that aid and abet the Church of Rome as "she spontaneously expands and propagates herself" and advances her towards the ultimate objective of enjoying "in addition to liberty," "the favor of the laws and the patronage of the public authority". How long now before America gives "life unto the image of the beast"? (Rev. 13:15) How long before the beast acts in fulfillment of Daniel 11:45? How long before Michael stands up and there is "a time of trouble , such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time"? (Daniel 12:1 a & b) How long before the Remnant of God "shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book [of life]"? (Daniel 12:1 c) |