Bible Study Guide

Foundation Doctrines of Christianity & The Seventh-day Adventist Faith


An in-depth study on Luke 21:24

Statement on the Godhead



By A. T Jones

Facts of Faith
By Christian Edwardson
(The closing chapters)
Chapter Links

Facts of Faith
By Christian Edwardson
The Complete Book
(From early Christianity to the End of time)

La SEÑAL del

(By special request)

Wm. H. Grotheer Manuscripts on Adventist Alert:


The Holy Flesh Movement 1899-1901




Welcome to, a website presenting the writings and sermons of the late Wm. H. Grotheer, Executive Secretary of the former Adventist Laymen's Foundation of Mississippi, Inc., in close affiliation with Adventist Laymen's Foundation of Iowa, Inc. and 

Watchman, What of the Night (WWN) Articles

Sermons of Wm. H. Grotheer  - (Streaming Audio)

Sound Doctrine

Current Prophetic Events

The Great Controversy Between Christ and Satan

Prophecy Fulfilled in History and Current Events

The Glorious Second Coming
(Very Near)

Jesus Christ's Own Prophecy
of the End
(Luke 21:24)
(A Prophetic Time Period)

The Ministry of Jesus Christ in the Heavenly Sanctuary

The Godhead
(Trinity? Duality? Trio?)

Doctrine of the Incarnation
(The Humanity of Christ)
The Everlasting Gospel
(Righteousness By Faith)
Current Doctrinal and Organizational Issues




Work of Adventist Laymen's Foundation of Mississippi Officially Resumed
By Adventist Laymen's Foundation of Iowa, Inc.

The new Watchman, What of the Night? published
by Adventist Laymen's Foundation of Iowa
NEW WWN 2(15)-3(15)


No person authorized by Adventist Laymen's Foundation of Mississippi-Arkansas donated books and papers of Wm. H. Grotheer/Adventist Laymen's Foundation to Andrews University Library



(Cf. Adventist Laymen's Foundation Library; Setting Some Facts Straight)

Books and Manuscripts Sales at Home Page


(Digital booklet)

(Free printed copy available through ("Contact Us" interactive button)

  About Us
  Contact Us


Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unright-eousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.  2 Cor. 6:14-18


then Review again, and
Review all that you've Reviewed"  {Quoted from WWN 5-7(00)

After the truth has been proclaimed as a witness to all nations, every conceivable power of evil will be set in operation, and minds will be confused by many voices crying, "Lo, here is Christ, Lo, he is there. This is the truth, I have the message from God, he has sent me with great light." Then there will be a removing of the landmarks, and an attempt to tear down the pillars of our faith. (R&H, December 13, 1892.)



"A Message Whose Time Has Come"

Windows Media

Windows Media 54kbps

Windows Media 11kbps




A Major Path For Rome Among Many Converging through Jerusalem to Global Domination By Satan in Person - the Ultimate Antichrist


(The Roman Catholic Social Doctrine - Ascendancy of the Roman Catholic dogma in the body politic of the United States.)



Daniel 7 and Leviticus 16 Harmonized

Judgment of the Righteous Before the Ancient of Days?

(An exegesis of John 5:22, 24, 27)











Windows Media
Windows Media 54kbps

Windows Media 11kbps



Americanism Laid to Rest
(End Times Seminar Excerpt)
And Related Prophetic Events

And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.  John 8:32 

My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me . . .  Hosea 4:6

For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.  2 Tim. 4:3-4

And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord will consume with the breath of His mouth and destroy with the brightness of His coming. The coming of the lawless one is according to the working of Satan, with all power, signs, and lying wonders, and with all unrighteous deception among those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this reason God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie, that they all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
2 Thess. 2:8-12 (NKJV; emphasis added)


The contemporary body of corporate Seventh-day Adventists and many, many Independent Ministries are sleepwalking far behind the march of prophetic events.  It is high time to wake up and WATCH!

"The hour has come, the hour is striking and striking at you, the hour and the end!"  Eze. 7:6 (Moffatt)

The words of Jesus Christ Himself about His Second Coming - Matt. 24:

21For then shall be great tribulation , such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be. 22And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect’s sake those days shall be shortened. [Cf. Dan. 11:45-12:1] 23Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not. 24For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.  [Cf. Isa.  25Behold, I have told you before. 26Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, he is in the desert; go not forth: behold, he is in the secret chambers; believe it not. 27For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. [Wrote John the Revelator - Rev. 1:7, "Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him" and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen. (Cf. Rev. 19)]  . . .30And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. 31And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.  (Emphasis added.)

Of the great antichrist God has revealed through His prophet Isaiah:

12How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! 13For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: 14I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. (Cf. Isa. 2:1-6, 19-21; bold and italic emphasis added)



(From [S]

Is the General Conference Involved in Ecumenism?

With highlights and comments by the Contributor


The Goals of the Faith and Order Commission – Seventh-day Adventist Involvement;


An urgent message to Seventh-day Adventists as the prophetic time clock winds down:

Text of Sermon, Sabbath, August 12, 1989

BEM Triune Concepts (Seventh-day Adventists Beware of the Trinity dogma as a Mark of the Beast)



The nearness of the Second Coming of Jesus Christ


"A Message Whose Time Has Come"

Windows Media

Windows Media 54kbps

Windows Media 11kbps



Apostasy in Prophetic Interpretation
(A sermon to strengthen faith in the sure word of prophecy)





Economy watch: What next for Britain's collective wealth?

(Cf. DISTRESS OF NATIONS WITH PERPLEXITY - A Sign of the last remnant of time)

Keeping an eye on the European Union:

European Union

CONTINUING COVERAGE OF THE GEOLOGICAL AND CLIMATOLOGICAL SIGNS WHICH MULTIPLY - “the sea and the waves roaring” Luke 21:25; “Calamities, earthquakes, floods, disasters by land and by sea, will increase. . . ." - (R&H, December 11, 1900):

Natural disasters and extreme weather

Global Disaster Watch

The Global Disaster Alert and Coordination System




A Major Path For Rome Among Many Converging through Jerusalem to Global Domination By Satan in Person - the Ultimate Antichrist


(The Roman Catholic Social Doctrine - Ascendancy of the Roman Catholic dogma in the body politic of the United States.)

The insight of A. T. Jones that needs to be kept in mind as Roman Catholic legislation proliferates throughout America - "The papacy is very impatient of any restraining bonds"  more . . .

Ellen G. White: "When the leading churches of the United States, uniting upon such points of doctrine as are held by them in common, shall influence the state to enforce their decrees and to sustain their institutions, then Protestant America will have formed an image of the Roman hierarchy, and the infliction of civil penalties upon dissenters will inevitably result." (GC 445.1)

"When Protestantism shall stretch her hand across the gulf to grasp the hand of the Roman power, when she shall reach over the abyss to clasp hands with Spiritualism, when, under the influence of this threefold union, our country shall repudiate every principle of its Constitution as a Protestant and Republican government, and shall make provision for the propagation of papal falsehoods and delusions, then we may know that the time has come for the marvelous working of Satan, and that the end is near." (5T 451.)

My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children. Hosea 4:6

We do not go deep enough in our search for truth. Every soul who believes present truth will be brought where he will be required to give a reason of the hope that is in him. The people of God will be called upon to stand before kings, princes, rulers, and great men of the earth, and they must know that they do know what is truth. (Review and Herald, February 18, 1890; TM 119)

Spirit of Prophecy Policy on Family Planning  (For full context cf. Adventists and Birth Control; Adventists and Birth Control (Concluded)


Certain of the popular positions mentioned approvingly in some hyperlinked reports, essays, and blogs on this web page will of necessity cause reactions of strong disagreement, or at the very least discomfort, on the part of many readers. Regrettably, these positions cannot be separated from the core issues in the reports which prove the fulfillment of major end-times prophecies, and may of themselves be fulfillment of the prophecy of the Apostle Paul in 2 Timothy 3:1-5

LINK TO 2014

NEW►  Already scheduled to be the first Roman Pontiff to address a joint session of the U.S. Congress, Pope Francis will also address the United Nations General Assembly, and meet with President Obama during his visit to the United States this year:-

From [D]

Pope to address UN general assembly on September 25

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon welcomed the announcement that Pope Francis would visit the United Nations the morning of Sept. 25 to address the U.N. General Assembly.

In a statement March 18, the United Nations also said the pope would meet separately with the secretary-general and with the president of the General Assembly and would participate in a town hall gathering with U.N. staff.

Obama, Pope Francis meeting: Looking for common ground at the White House

The Obamas will host Pope Francis at the White House during his first visit to the U.S. on Sept. 23.

When Obama met the Pope for the first time at the Vatican in March 2014, he urged him to visit the U.S., and the two discussed a range of issues including economic opportunity, immigration reform in the US and protecting innocent civilians in conflict areas around the world.

Obama has often expressed his admiration for the Pope's ability to call attention to issues including income inequality, even while admitting they disagree on certain social issues.

Neither of the foregoing reports mentions the Middle East conflicts and in particular the Israeli-Palestinian issue. It is inconceivable that there will not be talks in Washington and New York on the subject. With the prospects of an early peace settlement between the Israelis and the Palestinians looking bleak after the Israeli elections [more on this in the next update,] it will be interesting to hear what the Pope has to say in public.

NEW►  The New York Times has exposed the religio-political movement behind the congressional moves to undermine the Iran nuclear negotiations:-

Christians Loving Jews

HE was almost lost in the whirl of lawmakers, pundits, plutocrats and other boldface names who showed up for Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech to Congress last week. But the presence of Pat Boone was a key to understanding why John Boehner was playing a smart game of party politics to stand so solidly with the Israeli prime minister.

I’m referring to Boone the singer. But I really mean Boone the churchman. He’s a prominent figure among, and megaphone for, American’s evangelical Christians, who listened to Netanyahu’s remarks as closely and adoringly as any constituency in this country. . .

And days earlier, on a radio show, Boone described Netanyahu as a friend who was well aware that evangelical Christians constitute some of “Israel’s most staunch supporters,” numbering “in the tens of millions in the United States.”

He’s correct in that analysis, which was strangely missing from much of the media coverage of and commentary about the Netanyahu-Boehner alliance.

Yes, Boehner’s invitation to Netanyahu, rendered independently of the White House, was a way to get under President Obama’s skin and in President Obama’s way. And, yes, that provocation was manna to the most conservative House Republicans, who sometimes chafe under Boehner’s leadership.

But they loved what Boehner did for an additional reason: It catered to the evangelical Christians who are an integral part of the party’s base, especially for lawmakers from the reddest states or districts. In fact, as Ashley Parker reported in The Times, Boehner’s caucus gave him a standing ovation last week even though he was bucking them by linking arms with Nancy Pelosi to pass a bill to fund the Department of Homeland Security.

The prompt for all that clapping? Representative Doug Lamborn, a Colorado Republican, spoke up to thank Boehner for weathering attacks from the White House in order to make Netanyahu’s speech happen.

What part of Colorado does Lamborn represent? Colorado Springs, which is a Republican stronghold, famous for its concentration of evangelical Christians. . .

But the bigger story is Israel’s importance to evangelical Christians.

“Christian Zionism as a sentiment is not new,” said Dan Senor, a Republican foreign policy adviser who has traveled to Israel with Mitt Romney, Chris Christie and other Republican candidates. “But as a movement, it has grown exponentially in size and political sophistication over the past 15 years.” . . .

That’s a climate and a context that are essential to understanding fully the bear hug in which Boehner wrapped Bibi. He wasn’t merely welcoming a world leader. He was doing in the arena of foreign policy what he tries and sometimes fails to do with domestic issues: keeping the base in buoyant spirits.

A concise definition of “Christian Zionism," its history and prominent place in American Evangelical theology, and it impact on American foreign policy and international politics, is provided in a Jewish Virtual Library article:

Zionism: Christian Zionism

Christian Zionism can be defined as Christian support for the Zionist cause — the return of the Jewish people to its biblical homeland in Israel. It is a belief among some Christians that the return of Jews to Israel is in line with a biblical prophecy, and is necessary for Jesus to return to Earth as its king. These Christians are partly motivated by the writings of the Bible and the words of the prophets. However, they are also driven to support Israel because they wish to “repay the debt of gratitude to the Jewish people for providing Christ and the other fundamentals of their faith,” and to support a political ally, according to David Brog, author Standing With Israel: Why Christians Support the Jewish State. . . .

An important milestone in the history of Christian Zionism occurred in 1979, almost a century after William Hechler approached Herzl and offered to mobilize Christian support for a Jewish state: the founding of the Moral Majority. Founded by Rev. Jerry Falwell, the Moral Majority was an organization made up of conservative Christian political action committees that succeeded in mobilizing like-minded individuals to register and vote for conservative candidates. With nearly six million members, it became a powerful voting bloc during the 1980s and was credited for giving Ronald Reagan the winning edge in the 1980 elections. One of the Moral Majority’s four founding principles was “support for Israel and Jewish people everywhere.”

In 1980, Falwell, who ran a television ministry that reached millions of viewers, said of Israel: “I firmly believe God has blessed America because America has blessed the Jew. If this nation wants her fields to remain white with grain, her scientific achievements to remain notable, and her freedom to remain intact, America must continue to stand with Israel.” Falwell disbanded the Moral Majority in 1989, but conservative Christians have remained vocal supporters of Israel though they lacked a strong formal structure for pro-Israel political action. [This last statement fails to recognize the progression from Moral Majority to Tea Party.]

Of course, the Roman Catholic hierarchy was well aware of the Christian Zionist theology of the Evangelicals, yet they approved of an alliance with them. Evidently they saw the Evangelicals as the best agency for the promotion of their political action plan. Nevertheless, there was this major theological divergence between them. Christian Zionism is incompatible with Roman Catholicism:

Roman Catholicism and Zionism are Irreconcilable

In 1904, Theodor Herzl, the founder of modern Zionism, was granted an audience with Pope St. Pius X. His purpose in meeting with the Pope was to gain support for the founding of a Jewish state in what was then known as Palestine. As Herzl recorded in his diary, the Pope gave an unfavorable response, saying: “We are unable to favor this movement. We cannot prevent the Jews from going to Jerusalem – but we could never sanction it. The ground of Jerusalem, if it were not always sacred, has been sanctified by the life of Jesus Christ. As the head of the Church, I cannot answer you otherwise. The Jews have not recognized our Lord, therefore we cannot recognize the Jewish people. And so if you come to Palestine and settle your people there, we will be ready with churches and priests to baptize all of you." ( This response might smack of “anti-Semitism” to modern ears, which are ultra-sensitive to criticisms of Zionism. However, as Catholics, we should give deep consideration to the theological and moral implications of the words of this pope-saint. While many Protestant groups are now giving wholesale support of Zionism, Catholics must recognize the inherent dangers to their faith that Zionism presents.

Erin Drawson – Pope Francis in Israel and Christian Zionism

With many Christian living in Israel and many places being holy to Christians, it seems like the Christian stance on Israel as a state is important. Merkley outlines the history of Christians and their relationship to the State of Israel well, but the relationship with the Roman Catholics is most important in terms of Pope Francis. He documents an exchange between Herzl and Cardinal Merry del Val in 1904, the Cardinal explains: “I do not quite see how we can take any initiative in this matter. As long as the Jews deny the Divinity of Christ, we certainly cannot make a declaration in their favour… How then can we, without abandoning our highest principals, agree to their being given possession of the Holy Land again?” (Cardinal Merry del Val quoted by Merkley, 137). Herzl was asking the Vatican for their support, and was met with unfriendly conversation. “The next formal encounter recorded between official Zionism and the Vatican did not take place until April 1945… when Moshe Shertok of the Jewish Agency was greeted in private audience by Pope Pius XII” (139). This exchange was again unproductive. The Catholic Church was aware of the concept of Zionism and had considered it a possible answer to the Jewish problem, but “until such time as the Roman Catholic church could succeed in making itself the acknowledged custodian of the holy places” they were not willing to support the Zionist movement (139). . .

In my research I came across a term I was sorry to have never heard before: Christian Zionism. Naturally I read on to find another very interesting dimension to Israel and its support. Pieterse explains the simple understanding of Israel by Pentecostal and Fundamental groups: “The fundamentalist preacher Jerry Falwell pointed out that “God deals with nations in relation to how nations deal with Israel”. One of the foundations of this belief was the passage in Genesis (12:13), “I will bless those that bless you and curse those that curse you.” (Pieterse, 75). But this is not the single reason that Christian Zionists are in support of Israel- while fundamental Christians (mostly in the United States) are waiting for the end times, Israel is the most important place to those events. “[I]n apocalyptic Christianity the restoration and conversion of the Jews have often been regarded as signs of the endtime and of the return of Christ being imminent. The endtime or apocalypse, ushers in the millennium, the thousand-year reign of Christ returned to establish a kingdom of peace” (Pieterse, 76). This interest in Israel is very different from the Catholic understanding of Israel where the Catholic authorities recognize Israel and must co operate with Israel because of the holy sites- the American fundamentalist interest in Israel is much more active, where Israel plays a major role in their vision of the endtime that they are hoping for. . .

Of course the topic of “Christian Attitudes towards the State of Israel” has a long history and is very complicated, but over simply- [sic] the Roman Catholic concern is with the control of the holy sites, the mainstream Protestant concern is generally with the place of the Jewish people, and the Evangelical and Fundamentalist concern is with the second coming and Israel’s place in the final battle.

The prophecy of Rev. 13:14(b) identifies an Image to the Beast, not the Beast itself, hence the divergence of theology is understandable. However, there is far more that unites the Beast and the Image than divides them: Sunday observance, the immortality of the soul (deceptively hidden in the emotional abortion issue,) the triune God, and a vast array of Roman Catholic social teachings already legislated and being legislated. Furthermore, it is an indisputable fact that the same religio-political power that causes the Image to the Beast to be made, also causes "them that dwell on the earth" to worship the Beast itself. (There is sound biblical exegesis that confines this passage to the electorate which assents to the making of the Image.) The religio-political events of the decades since the late 1970s are a demonstration of the precision with which the prophecy predicts the course of history in the United States of America. What has been fulfilled sets the seal on what is to come in the immediate future.

As is indicated by the foregoing, the Image to the Beast is deeply involved in foreign policy, and can be seen to be setting the stage for the final conflicts predicted by Dan. 11:40-44. An event following the Netanyahu speech to Congress accentuates this reality:

G.O.P. Senators’ Letter to Iran About Nuclear Deal Angers White House

The fractious debate over a possible nuclear deal with Iran escalated on Monday as 47 Republican senators warned Iran about making an agreement with President Obama, and the White House accused them of undercutting foreign policy.

In a rare direct congressional intervention into diplomatic negotiations, the Republicans signed an open letter addressed to “leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran” declaring that any agreement without legislative approval could be reversed by the next president “with the stroke of a pen.”

The letter appeared aimed at unraveling a framework agreement even as negotiators grew close to reaching it. Mr. Obama, working with leaders of five other world powers, argues that the pact would be the best way to keep Iran from obtaining a nuclear bomb. But critics from both parties say that such a deal would be a dangerous charade that would leave Iran with the opportunity to eventually build weapons that could be used against Israel or other foes.

While the possible agreement has drawn bipartisan criticism, the letter, signed only by Republicans, underscored the increasingly party-line flavor of the clash. Just last week, the Republican House speaker, John A. Boehner, gave Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel the platform of a joint meeting of Congress to denounce the developing deal, and Senate Republicans briefly tried to advance legislation aimed at forcing Mr. Obama to submit it to Congress, alienating Democratic allies.

The author of the letter is a freshman Republican Senator from Arkansas. His religio-political connections speak volumes:

The Making of a Conservative Superstar

Harvard opened the eyes of the idealistic young man to a new world of intellectual possibility. “At Harvard College, I discovered political philosophy as a way of life,” Cotton wrote, a few years later, on the dedication page that preceded his 92-page senior thesis on the Federalist Papers.

The thesis, whose contents are revealed here for the first time, provides a window into a political candidate who is otherwise something of a cipher. Cotton, now a 37-year-old first-term congressman challenging Arkansas’ incumbent senior senator, Mark Pryor, has largely been defined by his résumé: the impressive credentials, from Harvard to the elite echelons of the military, and the conservative philosophy, illustrated by a record of votes in Congress that puts him on the rightward extreme of today’s Republican Party. He unites the factions of the Republican civil war: The establishment loves his background, while the Tea Party loves his ideological purity. The Weekly Standard’s editor, William Kristol, considers him one of the GOP's most promising new faces; Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus calls him one of the party’s top recruits; conservative bloggers long to speed the day when he appears on a national ticket.

Tom Cotton’s Influence

In 2012, he was elected to the House, where one of his first acts was to call for an amendment to a sanctions bill that would impose penalties not only on those who broke the law but also on their relatives, including their “great-grandkids,” “to the third degree of sanguinity.” The amendment failed—as the Washington Post pointed out, it was blatantly unconstitutional—but Cotton didn’t have much time for regret, because he had already decided to run for the Senate against Mark Pryor, the two-term Democratic incumbent, with the backing of the Tea Party Express, the Club for Growth, and national Republican figures who regarded his future as limitless. (Last September, the Atlantic ran a profile of Cotton entitled “The Making of a Conservative Superstar.”)

Cotton campaigned by opposing abortion rights and Obamacare, and by appealing to fellow veterans and foreign-policy hawks, while touring the state, as the AP reported, “in a bus decorated with a giant boot print on the front, the Arkansas flag and camouflage.” Last spring, on “Morning Joe,” when asked about suggestions that he was “extreme,” Cotton replied with a reference to Pryor’s record: “The only thing that’s extreme is casting the decisive vote for Obamacare five years ago.” He beat Pryor by seventeen points. In addition to trying to scuttle the Iran talks, during the two months that Cotton has been in the Senate he has attempted to block the release of any more detainees held at Guantánamo, even though nearly half of them have been determined to pose no threat to the United States. Cotton’s recommendation was that the prisoners should “rot in hell.”

Something seems to be out of kilter in the political marketplace that yielded Tom Cotton. How are younger legislators with assets like military experience—something in too short supply in Congress—deployed and, more crucially, developed, and which talents are rewarded? In last year’s campaign, Cotton had to answer charges that he was “reckless.” Recklessness now seems to be treated as a charm. Extremism, clumsiness, anger—other Republican members of the Senate, with a few hundred years of tenure between them, took a look and jumped on board. What was so appealing? Or what were they afraid of?

This man is not only reckless; he is utterly devoid of compassion and a sense of justice. In the estimation of the Tea Party, which was established by Roman catholic theoconservatives (theocons,) and the Neo-conservative Republican establishment (neocons,) this is the ideal for an elected representative of the American people! The favor bestowed on Tom Cotton by the Tea Party and the neo-conservative Republican establishment alike brings together a dangerous and volatile mix; and this is consistent with Rev. 13, verses 12(b) and 15-17.

Multitudes, multitudes, are in the valley of decision! (Joel 3:14.) Thousands of Seventh-day Adventists have misguidedly added their votes to those of the majority who heeded the call to make an Image to the Beast by voting religious zealots and warmongerers into control of the United States Congress. How many will realize their folly before it is too late?

After the truth has been proclaimed as a witness to all nations, every conceivable power of evil will be set in operation . . .

At the time of the loud cry of the third angel those who have been in any measure blinded by the enemy, who have not fully recovered themselves from the snare of Satan, will be in peril, because it will be difficult for them to discern the light from heaven, and they will be inclined to accept falsehood. R&H, December 13, 1892.

NEW►  The prophecy predicted that a deadly wound would be inflicted on Papal Rome. This was fulfilled in 1798, and it appeared that the papacy was finished for all time; however. the prophecy also predicted that the deadly wound would be healed and "all the world wondered [followed] after the beast." (Rev. 13:3.) In present times, the papacy is increasing in preeminence,  in all spheres of influence, at an accelerating pace. Note the headline below. The Palestinians place the Vatican first in seeking protection from violent right-wing Jewish settlers:-

From [D]

Palestine asks Vatican, UN protection from Jewish settlers

The Palestinian foreign ministry calls on the Vatican and on the international community to protect Christian and Muslim sites in the Holy Land, the Palestinian embassy said in a statement Wednesday. . .

"We call on the Holy See, the international community, the United Nations and the Security take responsibility and to put an end to settler attacks against our people, especially in east Jerusalem".

Right-wing Israelis and a responsive right-wing Israeli government will always be an obstacle in the way of the papacy's aspirations in Jerusalem:

Palestine Appeals To Vatican and UN To Protect Holy Sites

“The Ministry laments these continuous aggressions that are carried out under the eyes of the Israeli government, with the presence of their occupation forces, which guarantee the protection of extremist settlers. They are very grave aggression and provocations against places of worship, which we consider official encouragements to violence and extremism, and declarations of war on Jerusalem and its citizens,” reads the press release.

According to Palestine’s Embassy, “the Israeli government is totally responsible for these crimes.”

The Vatican has in the past supported Palestinian efforts to exert pressure on the Israeli government through the United Nations. (Cf. What a clever strategy!) The obstacle in the way of the papacy's ambitions will be overcome sooner or later. How soon remains to be seen.

NEW►  By his personal interest in the National Prayer Breakfast, Pope Francis continues his determined quest for unity. Primarily a Christian ecumenical event, it also broadens the ecumenical movement to embrace other religions. This is exactly as Pope Francis and the Church of Rome would have it:-

From [D]

Pope Francis sends Message to US National Prayer Breakfast -

Pope Francis has sent a Message to the annual National Prayer Breakfast in Washington, DC, which was attended by US President Barack Obama, lawmakers from both parties, and thousands of guests.

A portion of the Message was read during the event, which has taken place since 1953.

The National Prayer Breakfast is a corruption of true Christianity, breeding false piety and hypocrisy. It is also a part of the framework of the Image to the Beast:

Political prayer breakfasts are bad religion [A 2010 article] -

THERE ARE only three things wrong with the National Prayer Breakfast: the past, the present, and the future. Last week, President Obama presided at the annual Washington event before what the New York Times called “a bipartisan array’’ of national and international figures. “I assure you,’’ he told them, “I’m praying a lot these days.’’ The president went with the flow of public piety, singing prayer’s praises as a source of calm, strength, and civility. It “can touch our hearts with humility,’’ he said. That had the ring of truth, since the prayer breakfast confronts the president with how little personal freedom he has. He could no more boycott the toe-curling display of religiosity than he could remove that flag pin from his lapel. Religion is not supposed to be coercive in this country, but the prayer breakfast is the ultimate command performance, and that is only part of the problem.

Washington is the Vatican of a larger cult. In municipalities across the country, and on US military bases worldwide, government officials gather to bow their heads and invoke God’s blessing - an exercise that should seem benign. But these official liturgies are fraught with dangerous implications. . . The breakfasts are “ecumenical,’’ with Jews and Muslims prominently invited, yet the organizing network, the Fellowship Foundation, aggressively promotes Jesus, who has become a kind of mascot of American military culture. . . I once observed to an Air Force general that his “voluntary’’ prayer breakfasts had to feel coercive to his juniors, and he squinted at me, “I’ll call off my prayer breakfast when the commander-in-chief calls off his.’’

It all began in 1953, when Dwight D. Eisenhower presided at the first “Presidential Prayer Breakfast,’’ as it was called then. That year Ike was baptized, and Jesus was openly conscripted into the fight against what Secretary of State John Foster Dulles called “the godless atheism’’ of Communism. Billy Graham, with his “Crusades,’’ was installed as the American pope, and “under God’’ was added to the Pledge of Allegiance. . . The good-versus-evil bi-polarity of the Cold War was enshrined . . . America had reinvented itself as a Messiah nation, with apocalyptic fervor justifying a nuclear readiness to destroy civilization: Better dead than Red. Under Eisenhower, the US nuclear arsenal grew from a few hundred to nearly 19,000 nukes. Jesus, indeed.

The national prayer breakfast cannot be fully understood without reference to this history. However “ecumenical’’ its trappings, and whatever the small number of non-Christian participants make of it, the tradition amounts to a religious festival of American Christian nationalism. President Obama spoke of humility, but this overtly theological claim on God’s favor goes to the heart of the imperial hubris that has led to one foreign policy disaster after another - up to and including today’s wars that, despite all protestations, can truly be perceived as religious. . .

The framers of the US Constitution were wary of all such public piety. Not for nothing did they omit the word “God’’ from its clauses.

As stated in the quotation above, President Eisenhower was actually baptized in 1953, and starting the National Prayer Breakfast was only one of his decisions which laid the foundation for the present momentum towards a theocratic dictatorship in the United States:

Jul 30, 1956: President Eisenhower signs "In God We Trust" into law -

On this day in 1956, two years after pushing to have the phrase "under God" inserted into the pledge of allegiance, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signs a law officially declaring "In God We Trust" to be the nation's official motto. The law, P.L. 84-140, also mandated that the phrase be printed on all American paper currency. The phrase had been placed on U.S. coins since the Civil War when, according to the historical association of the United States Treasury, religious sentiment reached a peak. Eisenhower's treasury secretary, George Humphrey, had suggested adding the phrase to paper currency as well.

Although some historical accounts claim Eisenhower was raised a Jehovah's Witness, most presidential scholars now believe his family was Mennonite. Either way, Eisenhower abandoned his family's religion before entering the Army, and took the unusual step of being baptized relatively late in his adult life as a Presbyterian. The baptism took place in 1953, barely a year into his first term as president.

Although Eisenhower embraced religion, biographers insist he never intended to force his beliefs on anyone. . .

President Eisenhower may not have intended to force his beliefs on anyone; however, there is significance in the fact that he embraced Presbyterianism:


For the last two decades or so there has been an apparent increase in the amount of conservative Christian political activism in North America. Many evangelicals and fundamentalists who had previously shunned politics began to see the necessity of political participation in order to prevent the encroachment of the state upon their legitimate activities, such as Christian education, or to prevent national sins, such as legalized abortion.

Undoubtedly, this Christian political activity is a positive development in Canada and the United States. More Christians are taking their biblical social responsibilities seriously. But Christian political activism also raises important questions. Is the ultimate political goal of Christians simply to achieve certain conservative government policies, or is something more needed for a completely biblical agenda? Every true Christian can agree on policy outcomes such as eliminating abortion, stopping the homosexual agenda, and protecting parental rights in education, but is that all we can gather from the Scriptures as to God's will for civil government?

The learned men who wrote the Westminster Confession of Faith spelled out the basic biblical position on civil government. The "civil magistrate" (i.e., any power- wielding government official such as an elected politician or an unelected judge) is a minister of God (Romans 13:4). He must reward good and punish evil. How is such a person to distinguish "good" from "evil"? By God's authoritative Word, the Bible. Government officials must rule in accordance with the Bible. To put it in different words, Christianity must be the established religion of any society that wants to please God.

But to say that God requires societies to be governed according to the Bible raises further questions. Who should interpret the Bible for the civil authorities? Many different groups of conservative Christians have irreconcilable interpretations of the Bible. For example, some professing Christians are completely opposed to capital punishment for any crime, whereas others support it as the just punishment for not only murder, but other crimes as well. Which interpretation is true?

In order to resolve this problem a Christian state must be more than Christian in a broad sense of endorsing a general concept of biblical Christianity. It must be Christian in a specific sense; it must have a confession of faith that sets out its theological understanding of the Scriptures and how to interpret them.

It is this author's settled conviction that the Westminster Confession of Faith is the most accurate and thoroughgoing account of the doctrines of God's inerrant Word, and is therefore the most reasonable choice for a Christian state to adopt. It is the contention of this paper that the historic Presbyterian view of the necessity for the establishment of Presbyterianism as the official religion of every society is the Scriptural view, and it is the task of this paper to demonstrate that truth to the current generation of Christians.

The author is expressing a personal opinion; but he is not misquoting the original Westminster Confession as it related to civil government and Christianity. Although the original Westminster Confession was revised in the United States, it is clear that it has continued to exert influence, as demonstrated by the author and other Presbyterians. It is quite likely that it influenced President Eisenhower. Now the National Prayer Breakfast has contributed greatly to the sanctimoniousness and hypocrisy of modern American politicians:

The National Prayer Breakfast shouldn't exist -

The National Prayer Breakfast shouldn’t exist, at least not in its present form.

While the event is an overwhelmingly Christian gathering, the breakfast is billed as an ecumenical event that celebrates prayer in generic terms. Since members of Congress help organize and host the event, it would be constitutionally questionable if it was officially focused on Christian prayer. So, in the spirit of inclusion and diversity, the event features a few members of other religious traditions. For instance, Dalai Lama attended this year’s breakfast as a special guest. . .

In any case, despite the event’s nominal ecumenicism, the conservative, Christian explosion in response to the relatively modest claim that religions other than Islam have the potential to harbor violent sub-denominations shows that the National Prayer Breakfast doesn’t come close to putting all faiths on an equal, elevated playing field. Instead, it is a demonstrably Christian event, organized to further the idea that America is a Christian nation, with a few non-Christians scattered throughout the audience to give the event legitimacy it doesn’t deserve. [Of course, the ecumenicism, nominal though it may be is very much favored by the papacy.]

With two sentences about Christianity’s less-rosy past, President Obama scratched the surface of the National Prayer Breakfast’s nominal ecumenicism, showing that the event’s overwhelmingly Christian attendees were fully expecting to hear a series of obediently Christian propitiations, perhaps with some of them shrouded in more inclusive rhetoric. This should go without saying, but apparently it doesn’t: The fact that this is the expectation at an event organized by Congress and attended by the President is wildly problematic.

As unlikely as it may be, it would be a good start if our next president doesn’t go.

For the reader interested in further historical knowledge, God in the White House is a valid narrative of the presidents' religious beliefs and their impact on politics, from Washington to Obama. This is a particularly enlightening narrative in view of the Religious Right's distortion of the historical relationship between Christianity and the constitution and government of the United States.

NEW►  It would be reprehensible to ignore the turmoil in the Middle East which is giving rise to murder and mayhem around the globe. Taken together with other conflicts in the world, this in itself fulfills a prophecy of Joel 3. According to Seventh-day Adventist eschatology, this is a part of the last days of earth's history. On verse 9 the Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary states:

Adventist expositors have generally seen in this prophecy a forecast , not only of climactic events associated with the great day of the Lord, but of international military activities in the final days of earth's history. The gradual withdrawal of God's Spirit in these last days leaves the way open for a corresponding increase in satanic activity designed to lead men on to destroy one another. This process will reach its climax just before the coming of the Son of man in the clouds of heaven.

One might add that verse 10 aptly fits the "war" that terrorists are waging against powerful western nations.

The conventional wisdom is that it will take years to defeat ISIS. With the prophetic time clock winding down, this raises the prospect that ISIS will still be around when the actual events of Dan. 11:40-44 are taking place. Years ago Elder Grotheer said that those who thought that they understood the prophecy of Dan. 11:40-44 beyond identifying the general locations of the King of the South and the King of the North were kidding themselves. However, circumstances are changing. ISIS is spreading in the territories of both the King of the South and the King of the North. In the past it was difficult to conceive of any of the modern nations of those regions attacking the "he" of verse 45, a papacy backed by the armies of powerful western nations. Perhaps only madmen such as the ISIS terrorists would undertake such aggression. However, that is to presume exactly how the aggression will take place. Prophecy is often fulfilled in unexpected ways. In any event there are two significant points to consider in relation to ISIS:

1. It is now coming to light that the ISIS geographical strategy is based on Islamic eschatology. -

Islamic Eschatology - What are the end-time prophecies of Islam?

There are both minor and major signs that point to the climactic event in Islamic eschatology — namely, "the Hour," which is the time of resurrection and judgment. There is a Second Coming of Jesus in Islamic end time events, but it is not considered to be the decisive event. Rather, it is viewed as a sign pointing toward "the Hour." The beginning of the end times is marked by the appearance of the Antichrist, who is called the Dajjal. . .

The major signs pointing to "the Hour" are all critical events that are part of the end time sequence of events, beginning with the appearance of the Antichrist. Muslim scholars generally do not try to present a strict chronological order of what is going to ultimately transpire, but the order presented below is representative:

  1. The Appearance of the Antichrist, called the Dajjal. Despite the importance of this individual, he is never mentioned in the Qu'ran, only in the Hadith. He will be a Jew born in Iran to parents who have been childless for 30 years. He will have only one eye. He will claim to be a prophet, and then he will claim to be divine. He will deceive many by his godliness and his miracles. He will go forth with an army of 70,000 Jews and 70,000 Tartars, and he will conquer all the world except Mecca and Medina. His reign will last for 40 days during a time when one day will be like a year. Some passages of the Hadith indicate that he will have the word "Infidel" written on his forehead. His reign is characterized by cruelty and deceit. He has a militaristic mentality. His purpose is to be deified, worshiped, and to reign. There are many parallels between the Islamic Dajjal and the Antichrist revealed in the Hebrew and Christian Scriptures.

  2. The Return of Jesus will put an end to the reign of the Antichrist. (Keep in mind that the Qu'ran teaches that Jesus was not crucified or resurrected. Rather, he was simply lifted up to Heaven before His enemies could kill Him. One of the reasons He must return is so that He can experience death, like all other men.) Jesus will return to the Mount of Olives and then head to Damascus to confront the Antichrist. He will pursue the Antichrist south into Israel and will kill him "at the gate of Ludd." That is modern day Lod, located near Tel Aviv. It is the site of Israel's international airport. The defeat of the Antichrist will result in the eradication of the Jewish people. . .

2. The Pope and the papacy are already in the crosshairs of ISIS -

Security Beefed Up at Vatican over Islamic State Attack Fears

As Islamic State (ISIS) extends its reach in Iraq and Syria, the fears of the brutal jihadist group committing a terror attack in western states continue to grow. Just this weekend it was revealed the Vatican increased security over intelligence reports of a possible attack on Pope Francis. . .

Just two weeks ago Italy's Interior Minister Angelino Alfano warned the Italian lower house of parliament that Italy and Rome - including the Vatican - are a principal target of ISIS, given that it is a symbol of the West and Christianity.

While Vatican spokesperson Federico Lombardi tried to play down the recent increase in security, saying they had not received warnings of a "particular threat or cause for concern," Iraq's ambassador to the Vatican Habeeb Al Sadr shared a less blithe appraisal.

Al Sadr warned last week that ISIS sees Pope Francis as a key target, and may try to assassinate him during his upcoming trip to Albania on Sunday.

"What has been declared by the self-declared Islamic State is clear – they want to kill the Pope. The threats against the Pope are credible," Al Sadr told La Nazione on Tuesday.

After beheading Coptic Christians, Islamists say they will ‘conquer Rome’ next

The video shows men apparently being beheaded after being forced to kneel next to the Mediterranean Sea. A militant says they are sending a message “from the south of Rome”. At the end of the footage the same English-speaking fighter raises his knife to the water and says ISIS would “conquer Rome”.

Vatican Addresses Report Saying Pope Francis Is An ISIS Target

In an article published Monday, Italy's Il Tempo newspaper reported that the pope is a target of ISIS. The paper, citing an unnamed Italian intelligence source, states the pope -- who is considered the "bearer of false truths" by the group -- is "in the crosshairs of ISIS" and that the extremist group plans to "raise the level of confrontation" by attacking Italy and greater Europe. . .

ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who is behind the group's offense to overtake large regions of Iraq and Syria in an effort to establish its own Islamic State, issued a threat against Rome earlier this summer, near the start of Ramadan.

"Rush O Muslims to your state. It is your state. Syria is not for Syrians and Iraq is not for Iraqis. The land is for the Muslims, all Muslims," he said in an audio recording posted online and reported by the Telegraph. "This is my advice to you. If you hold to it you will conquer Rome and own the world, if Allah wills." . . .

While he has not endorsed American airstrikes against the group, Pope Francis has said ISIS must be stopped.

"I can only say this: It is licit to stop the unjust aggressor. I underline the verb: stop. I do not say bomb, make war, I say stop by some means," he said during a press conference last week, according to CNN. . .

While it is too soon to see a clear line of events to the fulfillment of Dan. 11:40-44, there are unmistakeable signs that this is yet another sure Word of prophecy verifying that the final events of this world's history are now in progress.


When the popes speak, especially when addressing gatherings such as the one in the following report, their words flow from the wellspring of Roman Catholic history and traditions. Pope Francis is no exception, however original or innocuous his pronouncements may appear to be to those who are captivated by Vatican II and Rome's current charm offensive. The religio-political terms used by him are pregnant with meaning:-

From [I]

Sri Lanka - Philippines: Holy Mass with the Bishops, Priests and Religious people gathered in the Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception (Manila, 16 January 2015)

The love of Christ impels us” (2 Cor 5:14). In today’s first reading Saint Paul tells us that the love we are called to proclaim is a reconciling love, flowing from the heart of the crucified Savior. We are called to be “ambassadors for Christ” (2 Cor 5:20). Ours is a ministry of reconciliation. We proclaim the Good News of God’s infinite love, mercy and compassion. We proclaim the joy of the Gospel. For the Gospel is the promise of God’s grace, which alone can bring wholeness and healing to our broken world. It can inspire the building of a truly just and redeemed social order.

"Ours is a ministry of reconciliation.":

The Sacrament of Reconciliation: Rising Again to New Life

Although often called Reconciliation in common usage, the term "penance" best describes the essential interior disposition required for this sacrament.

In fact, there is a virtue of penance. This is a supernatural virtue by which we are moved to detest our sins from a motive made known by faith, and with an accompanying purpose of offending God no more and of making satisfaction for our sins. In this sense the word "penance" is synonymous with "penitence" or "repentance."

"We proclaim the joy of the Gospel."

What the Roman Catholic "Gospel" embraces is set out in the following article, which contrasts that "Gospel" with biblical Christianity. The biblical references appear to be sound, although the commentary on purgatory is ambiguous in that it is not clear whether the two destinations are reached immediately after death or at the first and second resurrections respectively:

Research: Roman Catholicism

Perhaps one of the most important events in the history of the Roman Catholic Church is the Council of Trent (1545–1563). This gathering sought to counter and respond to the Protestant Reformation. It was at this ecumenical meeting that Rome ultimately anathematized, or condemned, the biblical doctrine of justification . . .

The Christian will recognize that these condemnations of justification by grace alone through faith alone in Jesus Christ alone stand in direct contradiction to Scripture and amount to an anathema upon the Gospel itself. Romans 3:20–28, 4:3, 5:1, Galatians 3:1–3, Ephesians 2:8–9 and Colossians 2:13–14 are just a few of the numerous passages that address the various condemnations which Rome set forth at the Council of Trent.

"For the Gospel is the promise of God’s grace . . ."

The Roman Catholic concept of God's grace is a philosophical contradiction of the biblical doctrine:

Sanctifying Grace

Grace (gratia, Charis), in general, is a supernatural gift of God to intellectual creatures (men, angels) for their eternal salvation, whether the latter be furthered and attained through salutary acts or a state of holiness. Eternal salvation itself consists in heavenly bliss resulting from the intuitive knowledge of the Triune God, who to the one not endowed with grace "inhabiteth light inaccessible" (1 Timothy 6:16). Christian grace is a fundamental idea of the Christian religion, the pillar on which, by a special ordination of God, the majestic edifice of Christianity rests in its entirety. Among the three fundamental ideas — sin, redemption, and grace — grace plays the part of the means, indispensable and Divinely ordained, to effect the redemption from sin through Christ and to lead men to their eternal destiny in heaven. . .

Since the end and aim of all efficacious grace is directed to the production of sanctifying grace where it does not already exist, or to retain and increase it where it is already present, its excellence, dignity, and importance become immediately apparent; for holiness and the sonship of God depend solely upon the possession of sanctifying grace, wherefore it is frequently called simply grace without any qualifying word to accompany it as, for instance, in the phrases "to live in grace" or "to fall from grace".

"It can inspire the building of a truly just and redeemed social order"

The Roman Catholic claim of redemptive power is staggering:

The Roman Catholic view of the Roman Catholic Church

[The Roman Catholic Church] is the minister of redemption (1471) because only through it can full salvation come (Vatican 2, Decree on Ecumenism, 3). . .

'An indulgence is a remission before God of the temporal punishment due to sins whose guilt has already been forgiven, which the faithful Christian who is duly disposed gains under certain prescribed conditions through the action of the Church which, as the minister of redemption, dispenses and applies with authority the treasury of the satisfactions of Christ and the saints.'

Finally, "just" and "social order" are allied. While there may be dissertations in which "social justice" is not connected to "social order," one would be hard put to find them. In every one of the following articles, "Social Justice" and "social order" are connected. The reader may do a search within the documents for "social order." -

What Is Social Justice?

Few terms have become as unmoored from their Catholic origins, and have thus lent themselves to misunderstanding in contemporary discourse, as has the term “social justice.” What does the term mean when it appears in papal documents—particularly when it appeared in the formative years of Catholic social teaching? . . .

'Social Justice' is a Complex Concept

In his 1991 social encyclical "Centesimus Annus," Pope John Paul II warned that a bloated state "leads to a loss of human energies and an inordinate increase in public agencies, which are dominated more by bureaucratic ways of thinking than by concerns for serving their clients, and which are accompanied by an enormous increase in spending." I call that prophetic.

Let's also be clear that the Church's teaching condemns the idolatry of money and material goods.

The Church finds another way, neither condemning market activities nor exalting them beyond their rightful place in the grand scheme of things. It asks us to work for the highest good and to contribute as we can our time, talents and wealth that we have earned for the betterment of the world. The Church also demands that we build just systems of trade that enable the poor to be the agents of their own betterment.

Social justice from religious traditions

Even before it was propounded in the Catholic social doctrine, social justice appeared regularly in the history of the Catholic Church:

  • The term "social justice" was adopted by the Jesuit Luigi Taparelli in the 1840s, based on the work of St. Thomas Aquinas. He wrote extensively in his journal Civiltà Cattolica, engaging both capitalist and socialist theories from a natural law viewpoint. His basic premise was that the rival economic theories, based on subjective Cartesian thinking, undermined the unity of society present in Thomistic metaphysics; neither the liberal capitalists nor the communists concerned themselves with public moral philosophy.

  • Pope Leo XIII, who studied under Taparelli, published in 1891 the encyclical Rerum Novarum (On the Condition of the Working Classes,) rejecting both socialism and capitalism, while defending labor unions and private property. He stated that society should be based on cooperation and not class conflict and competition. In this document, Leo set out the Catholic Church's response to the social instability and labor conflict that had arisen in the wake of industrialization and had led to the rise of socialism. The Pope advocated that the role of the State was to promote social justice through the protection of rights, while the Church must speak out on social issues in order to teach correct social principles and ensure class harmony.

  • The encyclical Quadragesimo Anno (On Reconstruction of the Social Order, literally "in the fortieth year") of 1931 by Pope Pius XI, encourages a living wage, subsidiarity, and advocates that social justice is a personal virtue as well as an attribute of the social order, saying that society can be just only if individuals and institutions are just.

  • Pope Benedict XVI's encyclical Deus Caritas Est ("God is Love") of 2006 claims that justice is the defining concern of the state and the central concern of politics, and not of the church, which has charity as its central social concern. It said that the laity has the specific responsibility of pursuing social justice in civil society and that the church's active role in social justice should be to inform the debate, using reason and natural law, and also by providing moral and spiritual formation for those involved in politics.

  • The official Catholic doctrine on social justice can be found in the book Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church, published in 2004 and pdated in 2006, by the Pontifical Council Iustitia et Pax.

While the advocacy of social justice can now be found in the ranks of a range of political and religious thinkers, it derives from an original Roman Catholic concept.

Pope Francis is an advocate of Roman Catholic supremacy in every fiber of his being. Multitudes will wake up to this fact when it is too late to escape it.

For earlier entries go to:



Elder Wm. H. Grotheer died on Sabbath, Saturday May 2, 2009.

He has left a rich legacy of theological writings and sermons which will be a blessing to many until the end of time.

Follow the adjacent link to a moving tribute written by a former student of Elder Grotheer who has been a friend of the Grotheer family for nearly fifty years.

In memory of
William Henry Grotheer October 10, 1923
to May 2, 2009


"The hour has come, the hour is striking and striking at you, the hour and the end!"  Eze. 7:6 (Moffatt)